ni'i ma BAI* cmavo-compound

sumti question asking for a logical proof; why?.

On affix form:

nibli
x1 logically necessitates/entails/implies action/event/state x2 under rules/logic system x3.

In definition:

mau'a (exp!)
shortening of {lo du'u ma kau *bridi*}, with {ce'u} bound to {ma kau}

In notes:

famsku
c1 (agent) concludes by expressing/saying c2=f1 for/to audience c3 via expressive medium c4 concluding f2.
lojycpa
x1 infers/concludes/draws conclusion x2 from premise x3 based on logic/reasoning x4.
na'itfa
x1 (du'u: proposition or kau-question) cannot be assigned a definite truth-value or answer